There are a number of techniques I use when setting an essay for homework:
I give students a choice of questions (e.g 1 from 3). Not so they have a choice (even though this is similar to exam) but because I get a wealth of material that covers more areas of the spec as examples – it also breaks up the marking a bit!
I start by setting essay writing homework for just the introduction and first main paragraph. Why? So I can check the essay writing technique is correct first. I don’t need to read 2/3 sides if the student has not understood the paragraph technique (point-explain-example- layered evaluation, with a 25% A01 vs 75% A02 split).
Students do not complete these under timed conditions and can use class notes/power points because it is important that students first of all develop the right technique. Once the students have learnt this technique it is then possible to start bringing in timed conditions.
On deadline day I give the students a number of highlighters. So in this case one highlighter for the main words (I pick) in the question and any use of critical terms. This shows me quickly if they have answered the question and evaluated. If there is a gap in highlighting I give them an immediate chance to re-drat. There is no point me marking work to state the obvious, it is also a very valuable self assessment process they need for the exam.
So here are some examples taken from my students’ work covering two DCT Pluralism questions:
There is no other means of salvation but through Christ.
This is a sophisticated introduction for a few reasons. It is not the quote or definition that makes this sophisticated but the way the student links the quote and definition back to the question in both cases (light blue). This introduction also has an evaluative tone (purple) and engages with the question (yellow – I picked ‘ no other means’ to highlight, whereas students had focused on ‘salvation’ and ‘Christ’, so this shows them to never ignore words in the question).
Please find power point for first half of Gender and Theology. What a topic!! After a week of going round in circles with Mary Daly (I have never come across this lady nor experienced anything like this) I finally got fingers to keyboard and then 22 slides later realize that Rosemary Radford Ruether hasn’t even made an appearance. Result…two power points.
Second power point on Rosemary Radford Ruether:
Preview of Lesson Plan
Discuss in pairs/ groups strengths and weaknesses (A02) of:
The patriarchal understanding of Christianity is mistaken and that a better, truer, non-sexist interpretation can be found
Christianity needs reinterpreting without the patriarchal elements, cleansed of their distorting influences
Christianity is intrinsically sexist and so flawed it should be discarded with all its sexist practices and beliefs.
Write down answers on worksheet table. Share views as a class
I am really looking forward to this unit. I am expecting fireworks! I have planned in a lot of group and class discussions because this is such a topical debate and one that is very current to our students. So I am going to use this opportunity to delve into what they really know and think about issues such as gender neutral identity and equality of men and women.
I will be setting out my discussions clearly with ground rules:
No talking over each other
Be respectful and polite to opposing views
Explain and justify your reasons for your view
Back up with examples
Do not talk when someone else is
I am also giving them a work sheet so that any quiet students, who do not wish to speak during discussions, can involve themselves by writing down their views and the views of other students. I am going to play the role of board scribe (to document relevant points) and facilitator. See discussion tips for more ideas.
Preview of Lesson Plan
A3 Birds and the Bees worksheet. Students must define the words from their own understanding.
A4 sheet of paper – fold into three columns. Students to use notes from previous topic to create a summary sheet of main ideas.
Discuss answers from quiz (see if it raises any good discussion about pluralism, multi faith society, inter faith dialogue ect such as ‘why do you think your parents sent you to a faith school? Are they Christian, go to Church?)
Research: Give each pair ten minutes to research a major religion (Hinduism, Sikhism, Buddhism or Islam) and write down 10 key features about the faith including prominent people (who they are, why they are prominent?) and texts.
Put all students who have researched a specific religion into one group and together they have to decide on ten features for their whole group.
On board draw five bubbles and label them. Hand out to every student an A3 piece of paper.
In groups students go to the board and write their top ten around their bubble. (Teacher to watch for any incorrect pieces of information.)